Archive | June, 2012

Good vs. Bad

30 Jun

“What is a good man but a bad man’s teacher? What is a bad man but a good man’s job? If you don’t understand this, you will get lost, however intelligent you are. It is the great secret.” -Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching
I think that there are many layers to this quote. At first glance, it seems to be a simple analogy of Yin and Yang, which would be appropriate to the Tao. However, to me the meaning runs much deeper than that.
“Good” and “bad” are individual judgements, or points of view. Thus the enlightened view all people simply for who they truly are, and rejects no one. He or she seeks to integrate with others rather than segregate.

If one does not learn to do so, then his or her potential for meaningful influence will disintegrate. And if one does not wrap his or her wits around this way of thinking, but instead must continue to judge others, then he or she will most certainly get lost in the contemplation of conflict.
A person is only as valuable to others as he or she can help them. And one cannot be a teacher without compassion and tolerance. Therefore, if one truly attempted to live up to these maxims, he or she might begin to find peace.

Best Turkey Chili

30 Jun


I LOVE chili! However, recently I changed my diet and can no longer eat beef. So, I’ve spent some time trying to come up with a tasty chili using turkey instead. It was a little difficult because turkey is rather tasteless and doesn’t simmer up like beef. This recipe is based off of a winner of the annual World’s Championship Chili Cookoff. I added a few interesting ingredients like beer and cocoa to create a blend of seasonings and flavors that create a mouth-watering chili that I guarantee will have your friends begging for the recipe.
Note: The key to really good chili is the chili powder. Most of the cook-off winning recipes use Gephardt Chili Powder. However, I prefer to have a little more control over my ingredients, which is why I created my own. You can substitute with the store-bought kind if you want.
Ingredients:

  • 2 ½ lbs. turkey cutlets, cubed
  • ½ lb. hot Italian turkey sausage
  • 1 Tbsp. olive oil
  • 2 cloves garlic, minced
  • 1 cup sweet onion, diced
  • 1 can Ortega green peppers, diced
  • 20 oz. chicken broth
  • 12 oz. dark beer
  • 10 Tbsp. Best Chili Powder
  • 2 chicken bouillon cubes
  • 6 oz. tomato sauce
  • 1 tsp. butter
  • 2 tsp. corn starch or arrowroot
  • 2 cans beans (optional)
  • 1 tsp cocoa powder (unsweetened)
  • 1 tsp black pepper
  • 1 tsp. Tabasco sauce
  • Additional Tabasco sauce and sea salt to taste*

Instructions:
Lightly brown the meat in oil in small batches and add to pot.
Sauté the garlic, onion and peppers until tender and add to pot.
Add the broth, beer, and tomato sauce and bring to a boil. Add half of the chili powder and the chicken bouillon and reduce heat. Simmer until the meat is very tender (up to 2 hours.) Add additional broth as necessary to keep meat covered.
In a small sauce pan, melt the butter, add the starch, mix and then stir into the chili.
Add the rest of the ingredients and leave at a very low simmer for another 15 minutes.
Serve with sour cream, cheese, and tortilla chips. Enjoy!
*Note: If you want even more heat, you can add some habañero sauce.
UPDATED: May 12, 2013.

Pacquiao-Bradley: Business as Usual

13 Jun

As Michael Buffer read off the scorecards Saturday night, I could have sworn that there was some kind of glitch in the Matrix. I think everyone in the arena felt the same momentary state of surrealism as they witnessed boxing’s worst robbery in a major fight since Pernell Whitaker and Julio Cesar Chavez fought to a “draw” in 1993.  That is except for Manny who just calmly stood by as if he expected the result.  At first I thought that maybe he didn’t hear the decision. But, then as he and Freddy (his trainer) just continued to stand there as if it were business as usual, I couldn’t help but be suspicious. Was it business as usual?

But, what kind of business are we talking about?  If you listened to the chorus of boos that filled the MGM Grand Garden Arena in Las Vegas it can’t be the kind of business that would be good for boxing. Indeed, it would have to be some pretty funny business – the kind that involves a great deal of behind-the-scenes conspiracy.

Far-fetched? Maybe. But, not any more far-fetched than the possibility that three professional judges could watch the same fight everyone else did and actually believe that Bradley won. Or even that it was just a close victory for Pacquiao. There didn’t seem to be a single person in the building who gave the fight to Bradley.  Even the HBO boxing analyst Max Kellerman said he scored it eight rounds to four for Pacquiao, and that he thought doing so was being generous to Bradley. Ten rounds to two, nine to three, and even 11 to one in favor of Pacquiao were more common spreads among those who covered the fight.

So, when people tried to understand why Pacquiao lost a fight where he landed more punches than Bradley in every round except for one, while connecting on a much higher percentage of his blows, it’s no surprise that foul play came immediately to mind. Anyone who searched for a rational explanation for this result was bound to come up empty.

I have seen Manny Pacquiao get outboxed in the past— Juan Manuel Marquez did it in many of the 36 rounds he’s spent in the ring with Pacquiao, although it was never quite enough to earn Marquez a decision. And Bradley’s performance Saturday night hardly resembled Marquez at any time in the fight! For starters, Marquez never ran. He stood a step out of Pacquiao’s range, waited for him to attack, and timed his counter punches. It has been the most effective way to fight Pacquiao to date, yet Marquez was still knocked down four times in their three fights. But even though Marquez ate his fair share of Pacquiao leather, his ability to weather Manny’s storm and land his own precise counterpunches allowed him to do something Bradley never did — hurt Pacquiao. That’s why Marquez is still considered Pacquiao’s toughest opponent. Bradley is just the beneficiary of boxing’s most recent travesty.

Here’s what I think really happened Saturday night. We’re never going to know the truth. But damn, does it sure make the most sense!  Follow along this line of reasoning and tell me if you don’t agree.

Top Rank promotes Manny Pacquiao. He is the second biggest earner in boxing, after Floyd Mayweather. But, because Pacquiao has fought more frequently than Floyd over the past five years, he has actually generated more overall revenue. The Bradley fight didn’t even sell out the MGM Grand Garden Arena, and it’s expected to do lower pay-per-view numbers — largely because Bradley doesn’t have much of a following — but when all the revenue is added up for Saturday’s fight, Pacquiao will have once again made Top Rank many millions of dollars.

In recent years, Bob Arum and Top Rank have become somewhat notorious for their reluctance to make big fights with boxers promoted by other companies. The reason? Business is always better for Top Rank when they schedule fights between two Top Rank stars. That way, once the fighters receive their guaranteed purses and negotiated percentages of the TV revenue, the rest of the pie goes straight to Top Rank. If Top Rank were to stage a fight in conjunction with Golden Boy or another major promoter, the company’s earnings would essentially be cut in half.

This is why Bradley was never considered a likely opponent for Pacquiao until last year, when he left his former promoter and signed with Top Rank. It’s also one of the reasons why a fight between Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather has never been made. Even though Mayweather-Pacquiao would create the biggest payday in boxing history, Top Rank would have to split that payday with Mayweather’s team and the resulting profits might not exceed what Top Rank can make by pitting Pacquiao against an in-house fighter, even if the opponent is nowhere near as talented or famous as Mayweather.

Instead, Top Rank prefers to match Pacquiao with its own fighters. But, Pacquiao has beaten nearly every credible foe (Cotto, Clottey, Margarito, Mosley, and Marquez) in Top Rank’s stable in recent years. Therefore, Pacquiao’s loss to Bradley solved the problem of finding Manny’s next opponent. Instead of force-feeding the public a fourth Marquez fight, Top Rank can stage the Pacquiao-Bradley rematch, and they can reasonably expect the fight to generate greater profits than the first one, since Bradley’s public profile will grow and boxing fans will be keen to watch Pacquiao attempt to set the record straight with a knockout. Indeed, even Bob Arum himself admitted after that fight, “I am going to make a lot of money in the rematch.”

Are these backstage plots real? Your guess is as good as mine, but it seems that they have become just as much a part of the “entertainment value” of boxing as what happens in the ring. For, trying to understand the promoters’ motives and anticipate their next moves seems to create just as much media interest as watching Pacquiao overwhelm his opponents. Apparently, boxing writers and hard-core fans understand that the game behind the scenes is just as important as the sport inside the ring.  They don’t seem to mind that a scam artist like Arum, who makes everyone who cares about boxing feel like a schmuck, continues to degrade the sport that they love in the name of “business.”  Because, every single schmuck including myself just keeps coming back for more.

How to Change Your Genetic Destiny

12 Jun

I have recently upgraded my diet and have been enjoying quite a bit of success (losing weight and having more energy to train.)  It’s based on the research of Dr. Peter D’Adamo who has developed a way of eating and living based on your biological uniqueness. He is the author of the internationally best-selling Eat Right 4 Your Type and the recently released book Change Your Genetic Destiny. The latter is what I have based my new diet upon. 

In this book he examines the possibilities of epigenetics and the use of diet and nutrition to profoundly alter gene function and genetic destiny. Dr. D’Adamo classifies people into six distinct genetic body types or “genotypes” based on how certain genes and physical characteristics are known to occur in combination. The claim is that the key to achieving weight loss and optimal health is customizing the diet and lifestyle to suit each genotype.

I completely agree with this theory.  Just as every species of animal on this planet has a distinct diet that is linked to its evolutionary track, so too must we as humans. And, although we can’t change our genes, we can influence the environmental aspects such as nutrition, exercise and how we respond to stress, which will in turn affect the way that the genes are expressed; either supporting health or contributing to illness.

The book includes a comprehensive test including questions about blood type, fingerprint patterns, physical measurements, family history, and other health parameters, which enables you to determine which of the six genotypes you belong to:

  • Hunter: Tall and athletic, with a square jaw. Prone to inflammatory diseases such as allergies and rheumatoid arthritis. Blood type O.
  • Gatherer: Emotional temperament and usually have a high BMI. Often have a history of crash dieting and have problems with appetite regulation. Blood type O or B.
  • Teacher: Naturally flexible and enthusiastic nature. Susceptible to bacterial infections. Blood type A and sometimes AB.
  • Explorer: Muscular, adventurous and intelligent. Sensitive to caffeine and medications. Any blood type but often Rh-negative.
  • Warrior: Charismatic and highly strung. Often age prematurely. Blood type A or AB.
  • Nomad: Very tall or short. Quiet, optimistic and rational nature. Often have sensitive digestive systems. Blood type B or AB.

This diet is supported by extensive scientific research; however, as with all successful dieting, especially with regards to health and weight regulation, it is a learning process and will most likely require a significant change in lifestyle. Nonetheless, if you like experimenting with different ideas and learning about the science of nutrition and health this program will provide you with inspiration to make some beneficial adjustments to your current diet and lifestyle.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about this diet and how it could be best employed in your special circumstances.

Yours In Health.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started